Tag: 3rd Ward

Minneapolis Weekly Wages | A Steady Increase

Data Courtesy of the City of Minneapolis - Graph Constructed by Urban Dynamics

Despite the Great Recession a few years ago, wages in Minneapolis have been steadily rising. As Figure 1 shows, the average weekly wages for Minneapolis increased from about $1100 per week in the fourth quarter of 2006 to just over $1300 in the fourth quarter of 2014.

An additional observation illustrates that the average weekly wages for Minneapolis were higher than both the metro area and Minnesota. And this makes sense. Wages should be higher in urban environments because of the potential for interactions between businesses, and workers and businesses. For example, Minneapolis’ six Forbes companies reside in the 3rd Ward, which is downtown Minneapolis; and they are all within a couple blocks of each other. And this does not count all the other businesses both small and large that benefit from the success of these six highly competitive firms.

Furthermore, the economic heart of Minneapolis, and the Twin Cities for that matter, is connected with Downtown St. Paul by way of the Green-Line (Light-rail) and the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport by way of the Blue-Line (Light-rail). This is not a direct cause of steadily increasing average weekly wages, but rather a possible correlation.

Finally, compared to the rest of the nation over this same time period, Minneapolis has been playing well above the average. According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics,

From 2005 to 2014, [the] average weekly wages for all private industries increased from $779 to $986, or 27 percent.

It is clear from this data that the average weekly wages for Minneapolis workers were better during the middle of the last decade and is still better today. As a comparison for that same time period, Minneapolis average weekly wages grew from $1104 to $1329.

In the next article, we will compare the industry with the highest weekly wages of Minneapolis to the industry with the lowest weekly wages of Minneapolis during the 2006 to 2014 time period. Then we will compare those wages against the national average weekly wages to provide a more in-depth picture of how the workers of Minneapolis have been doing over the past ten years.


Matt Johnson is a writer for The Systems Scientist, and a mathematical scientist. You can connect with him directly in the comments section, and follow him on Twitter or on Facebook

You can also follow The Systems Scientist on Twitter or Facebook as well. 




Copyright ©2016 – The Systems Scientist

The 6 Forbes Companies of Minneapolis

According to the 2014 list of Forbes 1000 companies, there are nine Forbes 1000 companies that reside in Minneapolis. However, after accounting for the political boundaries of Minneapolis codified by the city charter, and an argument challenging Forbes for the exact number of companies that belong to the Minneapolis system, Urban Dynamics proposes that there are only six Forbes 1000 companies in the Minneapolis economic system.

Here is the list of the six Forbes 1000 companies including their respective industries:

  1. Ameriprise (Financial)
  2. Excel Energy (Energy)
  3. Target Corp (Retail)
  4. Thrivent Financial (Financial)
  5. U.S. Bank Corp (Financial)
  6. Valspar Corp (Manufacturer of paint and coatings)

Again, this list does not include those Forbes 1000 companies outside of the political boundaries of Minneapolis. Those companies are Donaldson in Blaine, General Mills in Golden Valley, and Medtronic in Fridley. On the other hand, Ameriprise, Excel Energy, Target Corp, Thrivent Financial, U.S. Bank Corp, and Valspar Corp either reside on the light-rail blue line, which runs from Mall of America to Target Field, or they reside within a 3 to 4 block radius of the blue line in Minneapolis’ 3rd Ward (Downtown). In addition, they are all located within just a few blocks of each other; and their proximity to each other is what perpetuates the economic heart beat of Minneapolis.

You can also follow The Systems Scientist on Twitter or Facebook as well. 

Photo credit: www.aecom.com



Copyright ©2016 – The Systems Scientist

Challenging Forbes|Economic Elements of a City

Photo Courtesy of ids-center.com - Nicollet mall in the evening
Photo Courtesy of ids-center.com – Nicollet mall in the evening

According to the 2014 Forbes 1000 list, Minneapolis is home to nine Forbes 1000 companies: Target, U.S. Bancorp, General Mills, Medtronic, Ameriprise Financial, Donaldson Company, The Valspar Corporation, Xcel Energy, and Thrivent Finanacial for Lutherans. Forbes lists all nine companies with Minneapolis addresses. However, there is a discrepancy.

Indeed, six of the Forbes 1000 companies reside in Minneapolis proper, or within the Minneapolis political boundaries put forth by the Minneapolis charter. Matter of fact, all six companies are clustered together in the 3rd Ward of Minneapolis only a few blocks away from the birth place of Minneapolis itself – The Falls of St. Anthony. Three of these companies are located on the Nicollet Mall – Target, Excel Energy, and U.S. Bancorp. Their respective headquarters are within a hop, skip, and a jump from each other. The other three Forbes 1000 companies located in the economic hub of Minneapolis, Ameriprise, Valspar, and Thrivent, are located on 2nd Ave, South 3rd St., and 4th Ave, respectively. But there are three that reside outside of the Minneapolis political boundaries.

The Donaldson Company is located a good 10 to 15 miles outside of the most northern boundary of Minneapolis, near Blaine; General Mills is located a few miles west of Minneapolis right next to Golden Valley right off of the 169 and 394 interchange; and Medtronic, one of the most well-known medical device companies around, is located in Fridley, just a few miles North of Minneapolis. Why is this important?

First, Minneapolis has well established political boundaries. Within these boundaries, there are 13 Wards; and within these wards, there are dozens of neighborhoods. Second, there are cultural boundaries. In other words, each part of the city – Downtown, Campus (Southeast Minneapolis), South Minneapolis, Southwest Minneapolis, North Minneapolis, and Northeast Minneapolis – each have a personality. Together, these personalities make up the total personality of Minneapolis. In addition, these personalities interact with each other and interact with the politics of Minneapolis. These political boundaries provide a space for these respective cultural personalities to interact with the economic hub of Minneapolis. Similar to most other western cities, Minneapolis’ economic hub in centralized with respect to geography; and there is a dynamic behavior that resonates from this economic hub, thus interacting with the respective parts of the city. But there is also proximity.

Urban/Civic Sites
Urban/Civic Sites – Thrivent Financial, Downtown Minneapolis

Because of the respective locations of Donaldson, General Mills, and Medtronic, they do not experience the same interactive intensities as the companies in the economic hub of Minneapolis. This is because of their respective proximity to everything else. Think of it like gravity. The further away an object is away from a gravitational field, the less gravity the object will feel. This urban gravity could be the density of the population, the increased interactions of people due to the increased numbers of people, the rate of business traffic, the number of other businesses that exist near the corporation, and the increased number of potential opportunities due to proximity and exposure. There is also traffic: automobiles, buses, and light-rail.

Another way to think about this would be to consider a packed dance floor full of people. There is more activity and energy taking place at the core; whereas, there are less people with less energy on the outskirts of the dance floor. What part of the dance floor is better for business? What part of the dance floor is better for interacting with other people? What part of the dance floor increases potential and potential outcomes?

If the most basic definition of a system is its elements, the interaction between its elements, and the function of the system, then can Donaldson, General Mills, and Medtronic really be included in the general Minneapolis system itself? Can they really be considered to be interactive with the other economic elements of the city?

Should they be included in the economic system? Does the political system have the same boundaries as the economic system? The cultural boundaries are indeed not the same as the political boundaries. Perhaps there is an argument for including Donaldson, General Mills, and Medtronic into the economic system of Minneapolis? But then what about the smaller businesses that exist outside the city boundaries between Donaldson, General Mills, and Medtronic? Should they also be included?